Documents prepared by the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Program |
Yucca MountainIn the late 1950s, the National Academy of Science looked into the then-upcoming nuclear-waste disposal situation. At the time reprocessing of the fuel elements was a “given”; thus, it was just the high-level, short half-life decay products that were being considered as nuclear waste. Scientists decided that vitrifying them (making them into glass), encasing them in stainless-steel containers, and burying the canisters in geological formations that hadn’t seen moisture in millions of years was the best way to keep them out of the biosphere and eliminate the possibilities of groundwater contamination. This also allowed for retrieval of the valuable radionuclides if that became desirable in the future.
|
Twilight view of the 25ft boring maching entering the north portal of Yucca Mountain Pro's and Con's of Nuclear Energy The Nuclear Energy Independent The Con's of Yucca Mountain - Greenpeace Quizes: Answer the Questions High School Level Answer the Questions Middle School Level |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|